Yesterday Engadget reported on a Mac clone being commercialized by Psystar Corporation, a PC maker not widely known… until that moment: The Engadget effect sent so much traffic Psystar’s website couldn’t handle, and a few hours later it was down.
The computer -shamelessly named as Open Mac- a cheap alternative to those who want all the benefits of Mac OS X Leopard promises “better” specs in a mini-tower PC than those on the Mac Mini, and for a much lower price.
This is nothing but a commercial approach to the OSx86 Project; with an EFI emulator and some tricks, Psystar is installing Leopard on this assembled PC, but they are allegedly using an official distribution of Leopard that is being paid by the customer (The Leopard installation is a $155 option).
Until now Apple hasn’t given too much attention to the OSx86 Project, on which anyone with enough free time on his hands and not much interest in honor license agreements can install Leopard on a cheap PC.
Today Apple Insider reports Psystar defends their business arguing the license agreement of Mac OS X is a violation to antitrust laws.
Leaving the legal discussion for those with the know-how, I wonder if actions like Psystar’s will turn on some Apple interests to lock their software with techniques like hardware and peripherals signatures, and activation procedures a-la-Microsoft.
The Open Mac (now renamed as Open Computer) may be a good PC, but no doubt it lacks the quality endorsed by the Apple logo (a lot of years making and perfecting the product), and -for someone who writes this post on a MacBook- it lacks the style.
Via Engadget and Apple Insider.